Channel | Publish Date | Thumbnail & View Count | Download Video |
---|---|---|---|
Publish Date not found | 0 Views |
This is how a typical Web3 competitive audit works:
Code review: Reviewers analyze the project's code, often starting with a manual review to identify potential logic errors, inefficiencies, or vulnerabilities. Automated tools are also used to identify common issues.
Threat modeling: Auditors identify and model potential attack vectors, focusing on how a malicious actor could exploit vulnerabilities in the smart contract or protocol.
Testing and simulation: The code is subjected to a series of tests, including fuzzing, static analysis, and simulated attack scenarios. Testers can also run the code in isolated test environments to observe behavior under different conditions.
Bug bounties: Some projects promote public bug bounties, where white hat hackers and independent reviewers can submit reports in exchange for rewards. This makes the process more competitive as individuals vie to be the first to find bugs.
Reporting: The results are summarized in a report highlighting critical, severe, moderate and minor issues. Remediation recommendations are provided, along with a detailed assessment of the code's security posture.
Remediation and re-audit: The project team addresses the issues identified and, if necessary, auditors perform a re-audit to ensure that all vulnerabilities have been resolved.
Review and public disclosure: Once the code passes the review, a final report is usually published to build confidence among users and investors.
In a competitive environment, speed, thoroughness and the depth of insight provided by different review teams can be critical success factors. This process is critical to ensure the security and reliability of Web3 projects in a rapidly evolving ecosystem.
Please take the opportunity to connect with your friends and family and share this video with them if you find it useful.